baphnedia (
baphnedia
) wrote
2011-12-03 09:09 am (UTC)
no subject
*nods* I read an update, and found that the intent of the provisions was to make the law reflect existing Supreme Court precedent, established in Hamdi vs Rumsfeld in 2004. So, I'm not longer as... OMGWTFBBQ about this now.
(
7 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject