baphnedia: (Default)
baphnedia ([personal profile] baphnedia) wrote 2011-12-03 09:09 am (UTC)

*nods* I read an update, and found that the intent of the provisions was to make the law reflect existing Supreme Court precedent, established in Hamdi vs Rumsfeld in 2004. So, I'm not longer as... OMGWTFBBQ about this now.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting